
ANSI
ANSI Z136.1 - Safe Use of Lasers



Stoneware's real challenge is that surface spalling begins below the damage threshold — the material fractures before it cleans if energy level isn't controlled carefully. The spalling boundary sits at 1.2 J/cm², well below the 2.1 J/cm² damage ceiling, which means the working range is tighter than the numbers suggest. The saving grace is low porosity (2%): because stoneware is dense and vitrified, contaminants stay near the surface rather than wicking into the body. Grime, glaze residue, and biological deposits respond well at 0.6–1.5 J/cm² with 20 ns pulses, 1,500 mm/s, and 50% overlap. At 345 MPa compressive strength, the fired body is robust — the risk is thermal shock at edges and thin sections, not bulk failure. The pre-cleaning spalling boundary at 1.2 J/cm² — below the 2.1 J/cm² damage ceiling — means stoneware's working range is tighter than its mechanical strength implies; operating in the 0.8–1.2 J/cm² band is required to stay below the fracture threshold.
Owner showed us how to use the laser in about 30 minutes.
Fluence (J/cm²)
Stoneware has a narrow process window: the surface damage threshold is 1.2 J/cm² versus a damage threshold of 1.8 J/cm² — a working margin of 0.6 J/cm². Stoneware is fired at 1100–1300°C, producing a partially vitrified body with residual crystalline silica quartz particles that survive firing. Laser cleaning of stoneware generates mixed silicate dust requiring the Cal/OSHA CCR Title 8 Section 5155 respirable crystalline silica PEL of 50 μg/m³ (8-hr TWA). The low thermal conductivity of stoneware (1.5–2.5 W/m·K) and moderate porosity (3–8%) mean heat accumulates during rapid scanning — overlap must not exceed 70% and cleaning speed must stay above 800 mm/s to prevent micro-crack formation from thermal shock. Bay Area applications include artisan ceramic restoration in Mission District studios and commercial food-service stoneware cleaning in South Bay restaurant groups. Stoneware absorbs about 80% of 1064 nm energy. Heat spread rate is 7.8×10⁻⁷ m²/s. Heat spreads slowly. Low thermal expansion (5.8×10⁻⁶ K⁻¹) provides better thermal shock resistance than porcelain. Effective cleaning must stay below 1.8 J/cm². Never exceed 2.0 J/cm². Above 2.0 J/cm², thermal shock cracking occurs. Glaze may craze at lower energy level than body.
Stoneware has compressive strength of 345 MPa and density of 2.4 g/cm³. Porosity is low at 2%. The laser damage threshold is 1.2–2.1 J/cm². Thermal conductivity is 1.4 W/m·K. Thermal expansion is low at 5.8×10⁻⁶ K⁻¹. Hardness is 5.7 GPa. Stoneware is more thermally stable than porcelain due to lower expansion and higher fracture toughness. Vitrified body has very low porosity (2%), preventing deep contaminant penetration. Glaze layer absorbs differently than body.
Start with energy level at 0.6-1.5 J/cm², below the 2.1 J/cm² damage threshold. Use 1064 nm wavelength with 20 ns pulse length. Scan at 1500 mm/s with 50% overlap. Spot size at 500 μm. Stoneware has low porosity (2%) and absorbs 80% of energy. Never exceed 2.0 J/cm². Two passes at low energy level are safer than one pass near threshold. For glazed stoneware, reduce energy level by 20-30%. Glaze may craze at lower energy level than body. Salt-glaze surfaces are more sensitive. Test on a hidden area first. Watch for glaze crazing or body cracking.
Laser cleaning stoneware produces fine silicate particulates. No toxic fumes are generated. Use ventilation with HEPA filtration for dust control. Stoneware absorbs 80% of 1064 nm energy, so backscatter is low. Standard laser safety eyewear for 1064 nm is required. The primary hazard is thermal shock cracking above 2.0 J/cm². Stoneware has better thermal shock resistance than porcelain, but still avoid rapid heating. For glazed pieces, monitor for glaze crazing.
Stoneware's density and hardness make it attractive for industrial ceramics — chemical process equipment liners, food-service production ware, and architectural tile — where chemical cleaning methods either leave residue or attack glaze. Heritage restorers working on Victorian-era stoneware crocks, salt-glazed utility pieces, and institutional kitchenware stored in Bay Area museums need non-contact cleaning that respects historic glazes without abrasive surface loss. Laser beats sandblasting because it selectively removes surface deposits without eroding the fired glaze layer, and beats chemical soaking because stoneware's 2% porosity makes thorough rinsing difficult.




Stoneware has lower thermal expansion (5.8×10⁻⁶ K⁻¹) than porcelain, providing better shock resistance. Use energy level at 0.6-1.5 J/cm². Never exceed 2.0 J/cm². Multiple low-energy level passes safer than one pass near threshold. Lower expansion allows some margin, but still avoid rapid heating.
Dry laser cleaning is highly effective for stoneware. Low porosity (2%) prevents deep contaminant penetration. Contaminants sit on surface. Use energy level at 0.8-1.5 J/cm². No water ingress risk. Restores original color without chemical residues.
Salt-glaze and alkaline glazes absorb differently. Reduce energy level by 20-30% for glazed surfaces. Glaze may craze at lower energy level than body. Test on hidden area first. Unglazed stoneware can tolerate higher energy level (1.0-1.8 J/cm²) than glazed (0.6-1.2 J/cm²).
Use energy level at 0.6-1.5 J/cm². Never exceed 2.0 J/cm². 1064 nm, 20 ns pulse length, 1500 mm/s cleaning speed, 50% overlap. For unglazed stoneware: 1.0-1.8 J/cm². For glazed stoneware: 0.6-1.2 J/cm². For salt glaze: 0.5-1.0 J/cm². Two passes maximum.
Stoneware's low porosity gives predictable laser response, but deep industrial contamination typically requires more passes than surface soiling alone.