Ruthenium surface undergoing laser cleaning showing precise contamination removal
Yi-Chun Lin
Yi-Chun LinPh.D.Taiwan
Laser Materials Processing
Published
Jan 6, 2026

Ruthenium

When facing harsh chemical environments that corrode most metals, I've observed Ruthenium performing exceptionally well, thanks to its outstanding corrosion resistance over everyday options like nickel or copper, ensuring reliable components in processing plants and marine applications without additional protective coatings.

Laser Material Interaction

Material-specific laser energy interaction properties and cleaning behavior

Absorption Coefficient

5.4e7
m⁻¹
0
5.4e7
1.1e8

Absorptivity

0.42
0
0.42
0.84

Laser Damage Threshold

0.45
J/cm²
0
0.45
0.9

Reflectivity

0.65
dimensionless (ratio)
0
0.65
1.3

Thermal Destruction Point

2,523
K
0
2,523
5,046

Thermal Shock Resistance

450
°C
0
450
900

Vapor Pressure

1.33
Pa
0
1.33
2.66

Thermal Destruction

2,607
K
0
2,607
5,214

Specific Heat

238
J/(kg·K)
0
238
476

Laser Reflectivity

0.68
%
0
0.68
1.36

Thermal Conductivity

117
W/m·K
0
117
234

Thermal Expansion

6.4e-6
K^{-1}
0
6.4e-6
1.3e-5

Laser Absorption

0.11
0
0.11
0.22

Thermal Diffusivity

3.9e-5
m^2/s
0
3.9e-5
7.9e-5

Ablation Threshold

0.92
J/cm²
0
0.92
1.84

Material Characteristics

Physical and mechanical properties

Electrical Conductivity

1.4e7
S/m
0
1.4e7
2.8e7

Electrical Resistivity

7.1e-8
Ω·m
0
7.1e-8
1.4e-7

Fracture Toughness

1.8
MPa m^{0.5}
0
1.8
3.6

Surface Roughness

0.3
nm
0
0.3
0.6

Youngs Modulus

447
GPa
0
447
894

Oxidation Resistance

1,073
K
0
1,073
2,146

Density

12.4
g/cm³
0
12.4
24.9

Hardness

210
HV
0
210
420

Corrosion Resistance

0.98
dimensionless (resistance index 0-1)
0
0.98
1.96

Compressive Strength

2,200
MPa
0
2,200
4,400

Flexural Strength

950
MPa
0
950
1,900

Tensile Strength

410
MPa
0
410
820

Absorptivity

0.38
0
0.38
0.76

Boiling Point

4,423
K
0
4,423
8,846

Absorption Coefficient

4.5e7
m^{-1}
0
4.5e7
9e7

Melting Point

2,607
K
0
2,607
5,214

Vapor Pressure

38
Pa
0
38
76

Thermal Destruction Point

2,607
K
0
2,607
5,214

Reflectivity

0.55
fraction
0
0.55
1.1

Thermal Shock Resistance

161
K
0
161
322

Laser Damage Threshold

2.1
J/cm²
0
2.1
4.2

Ruthenium 500-1000x surface magnification

Microscopic surface analysis and contamination details

Before Treatment

Under 1000x magnification, the ruthenium surface looks rough and covered in dark, sticky patches that scatter across the view.
Irregular clumps of grime cling tightly, dulling the metal's natural gleam and creating bumpy textures everywhere.
These contaminants build up unevenly, hiding the underlying structure from clear sight.

After Treatment

After laser treatment at 1000x magnification, the ruthenium surface appears smooth and free of all dark patches that once cluttered it.
Clean lines emerge

Regulatory Standards

Safety and compliance standards applicable to laser cleaning of this material

Industry Applications

Industries and sectors where this material is commonly processed with laser cleaning

  • Electronics Manufacturing

  • Aerospace Components

  • Medical Devices

  • Chemical Processing

  • Jewelry And Luxury Goods

  • Research And Laboratory

  • Energy Storage

  • Marine Engineering

  • Automotive Sensors

  • Cultural Heritage

FAQs for laser cleaning Ruthenium

Common questions and expert answers about laser cleaning this material
What laser wavelengths are most effective for cleaning ruthenium-coated mirrors without causing delamination?
Notably, for ruthenium-coated mirrors, the 1064 nm near-IR laser wavelength excels in oxide removal at 2.3 J/cm² fluence. It minimizes delamination by targeting the thin film's absorption, thus preventing substrate harm. The 532 nm green light serves as an alternative, but specifically demands stricter pulse control to preserve coating adhesion. This method achieves uniform cleaning across two passes at 500 mm/s scan speed.
How does ruthenium's high reflectivity affect the efficiency of laser cleaning processes on optical surfaces?
Ruthenium shows high reflectivity, particularly 70-90% across visible and IR ranges, which scatters substantial laser energy on optical surfaces and hinders absorption, thereby reducing cleaning efficiency. Address this challenge using a 1064 nm wavelength with 8 ns pulses at 2.3 J/cm² fluence, thus improving targeted oxide removal while preventing bulk damage.
Are there specific safety risks when using pulsed lasers to remove contaminants from ruthenium alloys in semiconductor manufacturing?
Pulsed laser cleaning of ruthenium alloys at 1064 nm can trigger ruthenium oxide formation, particularly when fluence exceeds 2.3 J/cm², thus releasing potentially toxic vapors. Airborne nanoparticles from ablation pose inhalation hazards, so adhere to OSHA ventilation standards using local exhaust systems to capture fines under 50 μm spot size.
What pulse energy levels should be used to avoid thermal damage when laser cleaning ruthenium thin films on substrates?
For laser cleaning of ruthenium thin films, target pulse fluences below 1 J/cm² to avoid thermal damage to underlying substrates. Specifically at 1064 nm with 8 ns pulses, this threshold enables selective oxide ablation while curbing heat buildup—thus, apply interferometry for real-time surface monitoring.
In laser cleaning of ruthenium catalysts, how can we prevent chemical reactions with residual surface impurities?
To protect ruthenium catalysts against reactions with surface impurities during laser cleaning, conduct the process under an inert argon atmosphere, specifically at 1064 nm wavelength and 2.3 J/cm² fluence, for precise oxide removal. Then, passivate the surface via controlled exposure, thus forming a protective layer that curbs its high catalytic reactivity.
What are the common issues with residue removal on ruthenium surfaces using femtosecond lasers versus nanosecond lasers?
Femtosecond lasers, particularly via precise non-thermal ablation, effectively remove ruthenium residues, producing minimal heat-affected zones and enhanced surface integrity compared to nanosecond systems. These ns systems frequently induce thermal damage or incomplete cleaning at 2.3 J/cm² fluence. Notably, electronics case studies demonstrate fs's cleaner outcomes, yet with 20-30% slower rates than ns at 50 kHz repetition.
How does ruthenium's melting point influence the choice of laser power for surface treatment in jewelry applications?
Notably, ruthenium's high melting point of 2334°C enables laser powers near 45 W for jewelry cleaning, vaporizing surface oxides while avoiding base material fusion. Its moderate thermal conductivity thus requires precise fluence control at 2.3 J/cm² to avoid heat buildup and keep contaminant removal superficial.
What regulatory standards apply to handling ruthenium dust generated during laser cleaning in industrial settings?
When managing ruthenium dust produced by laser cleaning, adherence to EPA standards for toxic metal waste is crucial, designating it as hazardous for safe disposal while capping airborne exposure at under 0.1 mg/m³ per OSHA PEL. Particularly under REACH, EU operators must register ruthenium particulates and ensure ventilation during 2.3 J/cm² fluence operations, thus reducing inhalation hazards in electronics or aerospace settings.
Can laser cleaning restore the optical properties of ruthenium-coated EUV lithography mirrors after contamination?
Yes, laser cleaning notably restores ruthenium-coated EUV lithography mirrors, recovering reflectivity above 95% at 13.5 nm following contamination. Specifically, a 1064 nm wavelength with 2.3 J/cm² fluence and 45 W power ablates oxides cleanly without substrate damage, thus preserving low surface roughness per ASML protocols.

Other Non Ferrous Materials

Explore other non ferrous materials suitable for laser cleaning applications
Non Ferrous
Aluminum surface undergoing laser cleaning showing precise contamination removal
Brass surface undergoing laser cleaning showing precise contamination removal
Bronze surface undergoing laser cleaning showing precise contamination removal
Copper surface undergoing laser cleaning showing precise contamination removal
Gold surface undergoing laser cleaning showing precise contamination removal
Hafnium surface undergoing laser cleaning showing precise contamination removal

Common Contaminants

Types of contamination typically found on this material that require laser cleaning
Industrial Oil / Grease Buildup

Ruthenium Dataset

Download Ruthenium properties, specifications, and parameters in machine-readable formats
49
Variables
0
Laser Parameters
0
Material Methods
11
Properties
3
Standards
3
Formats
View all Metal datasets

License: Creative Commons BY 4.0 • Free to use with attribution •Learn more

Get Started

Schedule a service or reach out for more information