Skip to main content
Laser cleaning aerospace and defense materials including titanium, aluminum, Inconel, and CFRP components
Todd Dunning
Todd DunningMSUnited States
Optical materials for industrial photonics systems
Published
Mar 26, 2026

Laser Cleaning for Aerospace and Defense Materials

Bay Area overhaul shops stripping cadmium primer or chromate stacks cannot run that work through an acid methylene-chloride bath without failing ASTM F519 within 48 hours on cadmium-plated 4340 steel. Rule 8-29-305 also caps aerospace strippers at 400 g/L precursor organics or 10 mmHg vapor pressure, so the tank is not a generic solvent job. Pulsed 1064 nm lift of a YSZ topcoat has to stop before the MCrAlY: 70 percent overlap left ceramic, while the two-step bond-coat scan still leaves a 4 µm recast. Complete removal of a 200 µm four-layer coupon on A357 needed 5.09 J/cm² at 700 mm/s. Treat that coupon as a coating-stack window, not a generic aluminum number. (Photonics 10, 96 (2023); Materials 17, 2414 (2024))

Cadmium and passivation rules still bound the strip

MIL-C-38334 still names chemical and electrolytic cleaning of metals as its own family, so a pulsed pass does not retire that specification when the purchase order calls it out. AMS 2700 still governs passivation of corrosion-resistant steels after any process that can change the surface chemistry. Cal/OSHA Title 8 §5207 governs cadmium on plated hardware: CdU above 15 µg/g creatinine or CdB above 15 µg/L triggers medical removal, with CdB, CdU, and β2-microglobulin surveillance at the action level.

  • DoD logo

    DoD

    View official documentation (opens in new tab)

    MIL-C-38334 — Chemical and electrolytic cleaning of metals remains a named cleaning family on aerospace purchase orders. Laser strip does not delete a chemical-cleaning callout; it only replaces the bath when the order allows a dry method.[1]

  • SAE logo

    SAE

    View official documentation (opens in new tab)

    AMS 2700 — Passivation of corrosion-resistant steels after any process that can change surface chemistry. Stainless hardware that still needs a passivation state has to meet AMS 2700 after the strip, not assume the laser passivated it.[2]

  • Cal/OSHA logo

    Cal/OSHA

    View official documentation (opens in new tab)

    Cal/OSHA Title 8 §5207 — CdU above 15 µg/g creatinine or CdB above 15 µg/L triggers medical removal; surveillance is CdB, CdU, and β2-microglobulin at the action level. Cadmium-plated pins, fasteners, and landing-gear steel keep this medical-removal trigger even when the strip method changes.[3]

Sources(4 references)
  1. MIL-C-38334: Chemical and Electrolytic Cleaning of Metals MIL-C-38334: Chemical and Electrolytic Cleaning of Metals
  2. AMS 2700: Passivation of Corrosion Resistant Steels AMS 2700: Passivation of Corrosion Resistant Steels
  3. Cal/OSHA Title 8 §5207 Cadmium CdU >15 µg/g creatinine or CdB >15 µg/L triggers medical removal
  4. Cal/OSHA Title 8 §5207 Appendix A — cadmium medical surveillance Surveillance CdB + CdU + β2-M at the action level

Qualify the strip, then the fluorescent inspection

Qualify the strip before the inspector signs. Bay Area airframe work that still has to go dry into AMS 2644 fluorescent penetrant inspection cannot treat laser as a tank replacement with no etch. A 0.0003 in (7.6 µm) pre-penetrant etch is what restores detection after smear: as-machined stock only reaches 90 percent probability of detection on a 0.4 in crack, while the etch finds cracks under 0.10 in. NADCAP (aerospace quality accreditation) under AC7108/14 still wants strip cycles approved, documented, and traceable to parts. Link the aluminum skin, Ti-6Al-4V, and paint-stack pages when those substrates set the next call. (NDE-ED material smear; Photonics 10, 96 (2023); Materials 17, 2414 (2024))

1Rule out the jobs laser cannot close
  • Laser will not close fluorescent penetrant inspection on a smeared 2024-T3 crack unless a 0.0003 in (7.6 µm) pre-penetrant etch follows the strip; as-machined stock only reaches 90 percent probability of detection on a 0.4 in crack. (NDE-ED material smear)
  • It cannot stand in for a wet-chemistry family the shop's NADCAP scope still lists as chemical strip, and it does not write AC7108/14 strip-cycle records by itself.
2Set the stack window before the laser arrives
  • Complete removal of a ~200 µm four-layer polyurethane and epoxy coupon on A357 needed 5.09 J/cm² at 700 mm/s; residual paint stayed at 2.55–3.82 J/cm², so do not treat that lower band as a complete strip. (Photonics 10, 96 (2023))
  • A 70 µm acrylic polyurethane on 2024 aluminum ran at 178.25 MW/cm² with 1064 nm, 100 ns, 40 kHz, 500 mm/s, and a 50 µm spot. Do not relabel the A357 coupon as Alclad 2024-T3. (Materials 17, 2414 (2024))
3Keep the strip cycle on the part record
  • AC7108/14 subcontract and overhaul stripping still wants strip cycles approved, documented, and traceable to parts under AC7109 §7.2.
  • The etch that restores fluorescent penetrant inspection is part of that record, not an optional polish after the laser pass.
Sources(4 references)
  1. Pre-penetrant etch stock removal vs FPI probability of detection after smear 0.0003 in (7.6 µm) etch restores FPI; as-machined 90% POD at 0.4 in crack vs etched <0.10 in
  2. NADCAP coating removal / strip process records AC7108/14 subcontract/overhaul stripping; strip cycles approved, documented, and traceable to parts (AC7109 §7.2)
  3. Laser paint removal on A357 aircraft-skin coupons 5.09 J/cm² at 700 mm/s complete removal of ~200 µm four-layer PU+epoxy on A357
  4. Nanosecond 1064 nm strip of 70 µm acrylic polyurethane on 2024 aluminum 178.25 MW/cm²; 1064 nm; 100 ns; 40 kHz; 500 mm/s; 50 µm spot

Chromate, cadmium, and stripper caps

Hexavalent chromium on aerospace paint stays under Title 8 §5206 at a permissible exposure limit of 5 µg/m³, an action level of 2.5 µg/m³, and an aerospace-painting engineering waypoint of 25 µg/m³. Cadmium medical removal under §5207 Appendix A trips at CdU above 15 µg/g creatinine or CdB above 15 µg/L. Rule 8-29-305 caps aerospace strippers at 400 g/L precursor organics or 10 mmHg true vapor pressure. After 28 April 2026, EPA TSCA prohibits general commercial methylene-chloride paint removal except a workplace-chemical-protection slice for safety-critical corrosion-sensitive parts. (EPA TSCA methylene chloride (2024))

  • Hexavalent Chromium

    Cal/OSHA TWA/PEL: 5 µg/m³ TWA

    Title 8 §5206 holds hexavalent chromium at 5 µg/m³ TWA, with a 2.5 µg/m³ action level and a 25 µg/m³ aerospace-painting engineering target.

  • Cadmium

    Cal/OSHA TWA/PEL: medical removal CdU >15 µg/g creatinine

    Title 8 §5207 Appendix A: CdU >15 µg/g or CdB >15 µg/L triggers medical removal.

  • Aerospace Paint Stripper Organics

    Rule 8-29-305: <400 g/L precursor organics or true vapor pressure <10 mmHg.

Sources(4 references)
  1. Cal/OSHA Title 8 §5206 Hexavalent Chromium PEL 5 µg/m³; action level 2.5 µg/m³; aerospace-painting engineering target 25 µg/m³
  2. Cal/OSHA Title 8 §5207 Appendix A — cadmium medical surveillance Surveillance CdB + CdU + β2-M at the action level
  3. Aerospace assembly and component coating — stripper VOC limits <400 g/L precursor organics OR true vapor pressure <10 mmHg
  4. Methylene chloride regulation under TSCA After 28 April 2026, general commercial methylene-chloride paint/coating removal prohibited

Quick facts

Labels for the three strip points on this airframe job. A357 complete-strip lands at 5.09 J/cm². 2024 polyurethane ran at 178.25 MW/cm² and 1064 nm. Inconel ceramic cleared at 140 mm³/min with 75% overlap.

ParameterValue
A357 four-layer paint complete strip5.09 J/cm² at 700 mm/s
2024, 70 µm acrylic polyurethane178.25 MW/cm², 1064 nm, 100 ns, 40 kHz, 500 mm/s, 50 µm
YSZ TBC on Inconel 718140 mm³/min at 75% overlap
Sources(3 references)
  1. Laser paint removal on A357 aircraft-skin coupons 5.09 J/cm² at 700 mm/s
  2. Nanosecond 1064 nm strip of 70 µm acrylic polyurethane on 2024 aluminum 178.25 MW/cm²; 1064 nm; 100 ns; 40 kHz; 500 mm/s; 50 µm spot
  3. Nanosecond laser TBC and MCrAlY strip on Inconel 718 140 mm³/min at 75% overlap

Bond-coat recast and tensile leftover stress

A YSZ topcoat that comes off at 140 mm³/min with 75% overlap is not the same job as the MCrAlY under it. Hernandez IJPST (2019) measured the two-step 14-then-6 kHz scan that clears a 350 µm bond coat at 10 mm³/min with a 4 µm recast the NADCAP special-process accreditation strip record has to carry. Residual stress after that nanosecond strip stayed tensile at 547 MPa against −264 MPa compressive on the pristine coating, so the part is not back to the as-coated residual-stress state.

ConditionConsequence
Nanosecond TBC and bond-coat strip that leaves 547 MPa tensile residual stress[1]Surface is tensile versus −264 MPa compressive on the pristine coating
Two-step nanosecond strip of a 350 µm MCrAlY bond coat on Inconel 718[1]10 mm³/min removal with a 4 µm recast layer left on the metal
Sources(1 reference)
  1. Nanosecond laser TBC and MCrAlY strip on Inconel 718 140 mm³/min at 75% overlap; 10 mm³/min two-step MCrAlY; 4 µm recast; 547 MPa tensile

Stack windows, not a single aluminum number

Treat the A357 coupon and the 2024 polyurethane as separate windows. Photonics 10, 96 (2023) needed 5.09 J/cm² at 700 mm/s to finish a ~200 µm four-layer polyurethane and epoxy coupon; residual paint stayed at 2.55–3.82 J/cm², so that lower band is not a complete strip. Materials 17, 2414 (2024) ran a 70 µm acrylic polyurethane on 2024 aluminum at 178.25 MW/cm² with 1064 nm, 100 ns, 40 kHz, 500 mm/s, and a 50 µm spot. Do not relabel the A357 coupon as Alclad 2024-T3.

Fluence (J/cm²)CFRP1.5 J/cm²Aluminum 70752.0 J/cm²5.0 J/cm²Titanium3.0 J/cm²8.0 J/cm²[Stainless]5.0 J/cm²12.0 J/cm²Inconel 7188.0 J/cm²20.0 J/cm²0 J/cm²10 J/cm²20 J/cm²
  • This material (highlighted)
  • Other materials in this group
Treat the A357 coupon and the 2024 polyurethane as separate windows. Photonics 10, 96 (2023) needed 5.09 J/cm² at 700 mm/s to finish a ~200 µm four-layer polyurethane and epoxy coupon; residual paint stayed at 2.55–3.82 J/cm², so that lower band is not a complete strip. Materials 17, 2414 (2024) ran a 70 µm acrylic polyurethane on 2024 aluminum at 178.25 MW/cm² with 1064 nm, 100 ns, 40 kHz, 500 mm/s, and a 50 µm spot. Do not relabel the A357 coupon as Alclad 2024-T3.
Sources(2 references)
  1. Laser paint removal on A357 aircraft-skin coupons 5.09 J/cm² at 700 mm/s complete removal of ~200 µm four-layer PU+epoxy on A357
  2. Nanosecond 1064 nm strip of 70 µm acrylic polyurethane on 2024 aluminum 178.25 MW/cm²; 1064 nm; 100 ns; 40 kHz; 500 mm/s; 50 µm spot